The following rule changes were approved by the NCAA Men’s Basketball Rules Committee and the Playing Rules Oversight Panel. According to the NCAA, the changes will be incorporated into the rule book for both the 2017-18 and 2018-19 seasons. Many of the rule changes are subtle and will go unnoticed since they don’t want to change how the game is being played. That being said, these rule changes are essential to the game and will have an impact even though it might not be noticeable to most people.
For the next two seasons, NCAA Men’s Basketball will change the Court Diagram Rule. This rule will prohibit commercial advertising inside the 6-foot restraining area at each end line. This will keep a clean look on the floor and any institution that is contractually bound as of June 13, 2017, will provide commercial advertising in the 6-foot restraining area until the expiration or termination of the institution’s contract.
One rule change that will be somewhat noticeable to fans is rule 1-9.1. This rule change will extend the coaching box from 28 feet to 38 feet toward the division line. The NCAA claims that this will give the head coach more space to coach their team, especially when a play is on the opposite end of the court. This will also increase the emphasis on penalizing a coach who illegally leaves the coaching box. While it may not be much different for people watching the game, it will be very different for players. Players better make sure to get back on defense and play as hard as they can, because if they don’t the coaches have an extra 10 feet to storm up the sideline and discipline their team.
Rule 2-11.6 states that when a foul is committed by the defense and the ball is to be inbounded in the frontcourt, the shot clock shall be reset to 20 seconds, or the time remaining on the shot clock, whichever is greater. According to the NCAA, this will increase the number of team possessions and improve the flow of the game.
Rules 3-6.3.f and 8-3.3 have been changed to allow only the injured player’s substitute to shoot free throws when the injured player is unable to do so as the result of a flagrant foul or the player is bleeding from injury. The NCAA did this to correct the inconsistency in who shall shoot free throws for a bleeding player. In the past, there has been confusion with this type of situation.
Rule 4-34.1 was changed to add a requirement that the screener must be inbounds while setting a screen. This will correct an omission of a current rule that fails to require a screener to be inbounds. This rule will help clarify that the game of basketball needs to be played inbounds besides certain circumstances like jumping out of bounds trying to save the ball. The game is meant to be played inside of the lines. Rule 4-34.2a has also been changed to amend the definition of a legal screener by requiring that the inside of the screener’s feet be no wider than the screener’s shoulder width. According to the NCAA, this will clarify the rule and make it consistent with the current coaching practices and enforcement. Today in the NBA, we see a lot of screens that are debatable and could be called illegal.
Rule 5-10.2 now states that no less than .3 seconds must expire on the game clock when the ball is legally touched inbounds, and the official immediately signals to stop the clock. The NCAA did this to create a minimum standard for timing purposed when the ball has been legally touched. This will help clarify how much time is taken off the clock if a team calls a timeout right when they inbound the ball or if someone is intentionally fouled.
Rule 7-4 has been changed to designate consistent throw in spots for all fouls and violations by the defense in the frontcourt. The spots shall be either the 28-foot mark or the end line 3 feet outside the line depending on where the foul or violation occurred. All deflections shall be put in play at the point where the ball went out of bounds. The NCAA states that this will create consistency in the throw-in rule that we haven’t seen in the past. Another rule that has been changed regarding throw-ins from out of bounds is Rule 7-6.9 allowing an official to move a defender away from the boundary line where there is insufficient space for a throw-in to codify their existing practice. If a defensive player is crowding the player throwing the ball in the official now has the ability to move them back, so they can have the ability to make the throw-in.
Rule 9-12.4 now permits either an offensive or defensive player to be the first to touch the ball in the backcourt when it has been deflected by the defense into the backcourt regardless of who was the last team to touch the ball before it went into the backcourt. This will correct unfairness in the past backcourt rule. Before, if a defensive player hit the ball into the backcourt, the offensive player wasn’t allowed to touch it giving the defensive player the advantage to get to the ball with ease, and in most situations get easy fast break points.
Rule 11-2.1.e was changed to permit instant replay reviews on certain Restricted Area Arc plays in the last two minutes of the second period and the last two minutes of all overtimes. According to the NCAA, this will enhance the chances of correctly adjudicating game-deciding Restricted Area Arc plays near the end of the game. Rule 11-2.1.d now permits instant replay review to determine if a foul occurred prior to a shot-clock violation. This will enhance the chances of correctly adjudicating a difficult play. These instant replay rules are essential, especially at the end of games to figuring out the right call that could have an impact on the outcome of the game.
Handpicked For You:
Infomation from the NCAA.com
Posted on March 7, 2018 in Rules and Regulations
When doing research in the recruiting process for my daughter I came across the LRT Sports website. I was immediately intrigued as this was another dimension of the recruiting process that many people don't even consider. My daughter and I could "short list" schools based on the education she was looking for, as well as the opportunity to play her sport. LRT Sports not only gave us pertinent information into the recruiting process with different interviews of coaches and players, it also gave us insight into current and/or former players' opinions on the coach of that school in her sport. We could use this information to re-prioritize my daughters list of schools based on this feedback. I have many friends that are, or will be, going through this process shortly and I highly recommend using LRT Sports as part of anyone's recruiting process.
The college process presents a myriad of challenges. Factor in athletics and it becomes even more daunting. Now, add the fact that you have zero experience with sports. What is a the mother of a college bound student-athlete to do? LRT Sports has truly lived up to its promise. It has kept "the college recruiting process honest and easy by providing first hand information about coaches, schools and the recruiting process." Their interviews with current students, coaches, and professional athletes have provided realistic guidance. I am much more informed because of LRT Sports! The coach ratings are the most helpful. LRT Sports interviews allow us to hear from students as to how the adults are impacting not only their athletic experience but also how they are helping to shape their adult self.
The C.A.L.C. was thrilled to have Keirsten Sires come and speak to us on multiple topics relevant to high school athletics today, including recruiting. Keirsten reached all of our students and left them with great strategies that will not only help on the fields, courts, and mats, but also in the game of recruiting. She was a true professional and delivered a wonderful message.
Now that the recruiting process and the related stress is over, I wanted to thank you for your guidance. You did so much more than we had expected. Once you started the process by matching the best academic schools first, not the best sport programs, I knew you were the one. The way you laid out a timeline of contacting coaches, visits, and camps completely took any guesswork out of the plan for us. All of the student athletes that you put us in touch with gave us a look from the inside, and made us more comfortable knowing what was coming. Finally, using your website as a resource for knowing what to expect from different coaches based on former recruit reviews gave my son confidence before our meetings. There is no way we could have figured this out on our own, you really put us in a great position when decision time came.
I think hearing from other athletes is very beneficial. To be able to learn from people’s mistakes, and to be able to have access to those voices is really helpful; especially voices that have been there and done that. It’s very important for people to have access to information that could benefit them, and in this case there are many voices that can help the next wave of athletes.
If you have something that’s going to spell [the recruiting process] out for you… it’s so valuable. I think what everyone at LRT Sports is doing to spread the word and help advocate and educate athletes on the recruitment process is incredible.
Without question would have used LRT Sports. It would have probably been one of the most valuable tools that I could have had. If you want to know what these coaches are really like then I think this is the best tool out there. I’m really glad you are allowing recruits to have a resource like this moving forward.