The NCAA is always changing, for better or for worse or whether we like it or not. In the case of the two rule changes that were made by the NCAA Division I Council on June 13th, I think most might agree with the changes. Keep in mind there can always be modifications, but for Division I football players, this might be a step in the right direction.
Let us start by talking about the new redshirt rule. In the past, players were granted five years to complete four years of eligibility. This meant one year was spent not participating in any games or travel; this was usually during players first year on campus. Even if the player saw live action for a single snap, they would not be allowed to redshirt that year.
The NCAA redshirt rule change some say is groundbreaking. The same timeline still exists, but players can now compete in up to four games during their redshirt season and still remain eligible. This means that the typical redshirt-freshman will still be allowed to play in four games before having to sit out for the rest of the season. This can keep players motivated, so they work hard for playing time, and so they feel like they are still a part of the team, despite redshirting. Having game experience is excellent for a player’s growth and overall development as a player.
This redshirt rule change may even decrease the number of transfers. The feeling of being more involved and they feeling that the player is helping to build a program may keep them invested in their University. Instead of searching elsewhere to make an impact, players can see first hand what their role is come game day.
Moving on to the second redshirt rule. The NCAA has made tremendous strides with its change to the unfair transfer rules that were previously in place. Athletes seeking to transfer may now begin the process without permission from their current university. Colleges will no longer be able to prevent players from transferring or receiving scholarships elsewhere. Programs can no longer put limits on when or where athletes can transfer.
This benefits student-athletes that are capable of playing for top universities, but can also be dangerous for the athletes that are not being looked at by coaches. A player could submit transfer forms and be released from their current university, but if they do not have a college lined up to play for it can be a very risky move for the athlete.
Although the NCAA no longer forces athletes to get permission before contacting other coaches, conferences still can. Conferences, such as the SEC, may still make rules that are more restrictive than the national rules. It is unfortunate that the NCAA cannot make these rule changes across all of the conferences.
Both rules allow for the athlete to have the power. For way too long the NCAA placed most of the power in the schools’ hands. Now, especially with the transfer rule, athletes are treated more fairly and with a little more control over their collegiate athletic career.
The two new NCAA rule changes are significant improvements for the student athlete’s redshirting experience. Allowing players to play a little during the redshirt year can motivate them to work hard and for them to look ahead for their future as an athlete. Allowing athletes to have control on when they want to transfer and to where they want to transfer to is a step in the right direction for supporting the athlete.
Posted on November 26, 2018 in All Things Sports
When doing research in the recruiting process for my daughter I came across the LRT Sports website. I was immediately intrigued as this was another dimension of the recruiting process that many people don't even consider. My daughter and I could "short list" schools based on the education she was looking for, as well as the opportunity to play her sport. LRT Sports not only gave us pertinent information into the recruiting process with different interviews of coaches and players, it also gave us insight into current and/or former players' opinions on the coach of that school in her sport. We could use this information to re-prioritize my daughters list of schools based on this feedback. I have many friends that are, or will be, going through this process shortly and I highly recommend using LRT Sports as part of anyone's recruiting process.
The college process presents a myriad of challenges. Factor in athletics and it becomes even more daunting. Now, add the fact that you have zero experience with sports. What is a the mother of a college bound student-athlete to do? LRT Sports has truly lived up to its promise. It has kept "the college recruiting process honest and easy by providing first hand information about coaches, schools and the recruiting process." Their interviews with current students, coaches, and professional athletes have provided realistic guidance. I am much more informed because of LRT Sports! The coach ratings are the most helpful. LRT Sports interviews allow us to hear from students as to how the adults are impacting not only their athletic experience but also how they are helping to shape their adult self.
The C.A.L.C. was thrilled to have Keirsten Sires come and speak to us on multiple topics relevant to high school athletics today, including recruiting. Keirsten reached all of our students and left them with great strategies that will not only help on the fields, courts, and mats, but also in the game of recruiting. She was a true professional and delivered a wonderful message.
Now that the recruiting process and the related stress is over, I wanted to thank you for your guidance. You did so much more than we had expected. Once you started the process by matching the best academic schools first, not the best sport programs, I knew you were the one. The way you laid out a timeline of contacting coaches, visits, and camps completely took any guesswork out of the plan for us. All of the student athletes that you put us in touch with gave us a look from the inside, and made us more comfortable knowing what was coming. Finally, using your website as a resource for knowing what to expect from different coaches based on former recruit reviews gave my son confidence before our meetings. There is no way we could have figured this out on our own, you really put us in a great position when decision time came.
I think hearing from other athletes is very beneficial. To be able to learn from people’s mistakes, and to be able to have access to those voices is really helpful; especially voices that have been there and done that. It’s very important for people to have access to information that could benefit them, and in this case there are many voices that can help the next wave of athletes.
If you have something that’s going to spell [the recruiting process] out for you… it’s so valuable. I think what everyone at LRT Sports is doing to spread the word and help advocate and educate athletes on the recruitment process is incredible.
Without question would have used LRT Sports. It would have probably been one of the most valuable tools that I could have had. If you want to know what these coaches are really like then I think this is the best tool out there. I’m really glad you are allowing recruits to have a resource like this moving forward.