Sports, society, and life in general are always changing and adapting to fit the needs of changing cultures. Such changes cause techniques and mindsets, that have been around for ages, to alter to meet the present standards. Even changes on a small scale such as a little league adjusting its age rules/cut-off dates can affect friendships and player development. The question is always present, however; are rule changes implemented because of a league/organization’s self-interest or for the benefit of the game and society?
For example, in 2017, rule changes for the SAT had high-schoolers doubling back on their study methods and preferred scores. This year, NFL players have had to make significant adjustments to their tackling techniques after the league implemented new tackling rules and penalties that will substantially affect the way the game is played. Most importantly, the NCAA has now approved new rule changes to the Men’s and Women’s Track and Field which can cause some acute effects to the sport.
Although the new rules won’t be applied until the 2019-2020 season, I highly recommend that current and incoming track and field athletes affiliate themselves with the rule changes now. Before conversing about the changes with a few Rutgers Track and Field Athletes, the new rules seemed as if they would improve the sport. However, I also noticed that these rules will have substantial effects on some events, while not disturbing others.
Let’s Talk Business (Rules)
I’ll be discussing which rules, in my opinion, are the most important to the sport and some that may be harmless.
For starters, when I asked Andrew Comito, a junior distance runner for the Rutgers Track & Field team for his opinion on the upcoming changes, he wasn’t fazed in the slightest. He stated, “To be honest, not many or any of the rule changes would affect me because I’m a distance (800 meter-3k) runner. Our races don’t involve tape/handoffs etc.; it’s more or less just running it while the shorter/field events require more technique.”
Andrew appears to be correct about this. Most of the rule changes seem to affect throwing events, like Javelin and playing surfaces more than anything. However, there are a couple of rules that will affect Andrew and participants of all running events.
The Heart of the Rule
The Track and Field events that are at the heart of these rule changes are the throwing events. Any collegiate javelin, discus, or shot put throwers should pay close attention to next year’s adaptations because there are numerous rules applied explicitly to the to their events, rules explicitly 6-1.8.a.5 and 6-10.2.
Rule 6-1.8.a.5 will be incorporated to prohibit a thrower from having anything in their non-throwing hand during the course of a throw. The reason for applying this rule is because holding an object in the non-throwing hand can give the thrower an unfair advantage.
This rule specifically jumped out to me as being very interesting and specific. I am not ashamed to admit that I am no Javelin wizard so I was intrigued by this rule, and wondered why it is just now being implemented. Have athletes in the past won events due to this? And if it’s been clear to the NCAA that having something in the non-throwing hand can give an advantage, then why has it taken them so long to add this rule?
Rule 6-1.8.a.5 also reduces the number of landing sector judges from two to one in the javelin. I don’t understand why this rule is going to be applied next year unless it is for budget cut reasons. This is the only rule being registered that I felt like was out of the NCAA’s self-interests and not out of respect for the sport.
All in all, I think that the rule changes for the 2019-2020 season, for the most part, are being implemented for the benefit of the sport. Eliminating unfair advantages, having more advanced video reviews, and ensuring better-marked playing fields all sound like positives to me. I highly recommend that every current NCAA Track and Field athlete and any incoming student-athletes to review the rule changes carefully. Even if you don’t think they specifically target your events, read them just in case. It’s better to be safe than sorry and not be caught off-guard.
Below is a link to all of the rule changes that will take place in 2019-2020.
Posted on October 1, 2018 in Rules and Regulations
When doing research in the recruiting process for my daughter I came across the LRT Sports website. I was immediately intrigued as this was another dimension of the recruiting process that many people don't even consider. My daughter and I could "short list" schools based on the education she was looking for, as well as the opportunity to play her sport. LRT Sports not only gave us pertinent information into the recruiting process with different interviews of coaches and players, it also gave us insight into current and/or former players' opinions on the coach of that school in her sport. We could use this information to re-prioritize my daughters list of schools based on this feedback. I have many friends that are, or will be, going through this process shortly and I highly recommend using LRT Sports as part of anyone's recruiting process.
The college process presents a myriad of challenges. Factor in athletics and it becomes even more daunting. Now, add the fact that you have zero experience with sports. What is a the mother of a college bound student-athlete to do? LRT Sports has truly lived up to its promise. It has kept "the college recruiting process honest and easy by providing first hand information about coaches, schools and the recruiting process." Their interviews with current students, coaches, and professional athletes have provided realistic guidance. I am much more informed because of LRT Sports! The coach ratings are the most helpful. LRT Sports interviews allow us to hear from students as to how the adults are impacting not only their athletic experience but also how they are helping to shape their adult self.
The C.A.L.C. was thrilled to have Keirsten Sires come and speak to us on multiple topics relevant to high school athletics today, including recruiting. Keirsten reached all of our students and left them with great strategies that will not only help on the fields, courts, and mats, but also in the game of recruiting. She was a true professional and delivered a wonderful message.
Now that the recruiting process and the related stress is over, I wanted to thank you for your guidance. You did so much more than we had expected. Once you started the process by matching the best academic schools first, not the best sport programs, I knew you were the one. The way you laid out a timeline of contacting coaches, visits, and camps completely took any guesswork out of the plan for us. All of the student athletes that you put us in touch with gave us a look from the inside, and made us more comfortable knowing what was coming. Finally, using your website as a resource for knowing what to expect from different coaches based on former recruit reviews gave my son confidence before our meetings. There is no way we could have figured this out on our own, you really put us in a great position when decision time came.
I think hearing from other athletes is very beneficial. To be able to learn from people’s mistakes, and to be able to have access to those voices is really helpful; especially voices that have been there and done that. It’s very important for people to have access to information that could benefit them, and in this case there are many voices that can help the next wave of athletes.
If you have something that’s going to spell [the recruiting process] out for you… it’s so valuable. I think what everyone at LRT Sports is doing to spread the word and help advocate and educate athletes on the recruitment process is incredible.
Without question would have used LRT Sports. It would have probably been one of the most valuable tools that I could have had. If you want to know what these coaches are really like then I think this is the best tool out there. I’m really glad you are allowing recruits to have a resource like this moving forward.