Just hours ago, the NCAA’s top governing body made an announcement supporting a proposal to regulate athletes’ rights to profit from their names, images, and likenesses (NIL). Already, sports outlets and fans are celebrating, calling it a landmark decision, and looking ahead to the return of NCAA video games. The overreactions make sense—everyone is clamoring for good news in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic. Unfortunately, this is not it. Here’s why.
First, it is important to note that the NCAA’s big “plans” are all proposals, meaning that nothing is set in stone yet. In fact, Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith, who co-chairs the NCAA’s working group, told ESPN “that a vote on the proposed changes would likely occur in January 2021” (emphasis mine). In other words, the NCAA is entertaining rule modifications, and an entire class of fall and winter athletes will be hamstrung if or when the NCAA actually decides to implement them.
Second, as usual, the NCAA is imposing strict regulations over athletes who want to use their NIL to their economic advantage. For example, athletes might be able to appear in advertisements and reference their sport and their school, but they will not be allowed to use university logos. The NCAA is also considering limiting athletic shoe and apparel endorsements, due to these endorsements’ “history of ‘encouraging or facilitating recruiting and other rules infractions.’” The NCAA’s member schools will also “have a chance to give feedback and input during the next several months” while the NCAA finalizes things, which all but guarantees more guardrails will be set around NIL regulations before any rules go into effect.
Fans shouldn’t get their hopes up for the return of NCAA video games, either. According to Big East commissioner Val Ackerman, who is a member of the NCAA’s NIL working group: “It was the group’s conclusion that group licenses, which would combine school trademarks with student-athlete NIL in products like video games, replica jerseys and trading card collections are unworkable in college sports, largely because of the absence of a collective bargaining agency to manage the terms of group NIL use on behalf of the student-athletes.” It’s a questionable train of thought, considering pro leagues like the NFL and the NBA have successfully navigated these legal hurdles for years. But the NCAA does consider college athletes to be amateurs who cannot earn money from their NIL because they are students, not employees. I would bet the NCAA’s archaic notion of athletic amateurism is where Ackerman and the working group are rooting their logic when it comes to collective bargaining, even if independent groups such as the NCPA and the NFLPA have been working together since last October to navigate this terrain in collegiate athletics as well.
Amateurism is also why the NCAA isn’t entertaining the thought of schools paying athletes, either. Essentially, the NCAA is throwing around ideas to allow college athletes the right to be entrepreneurs, not university employees. According to ESPN, “NCAA leaders say it is crucial to keep the distinction between their organization and pro sports.” This is laughable to say the least, considering that last year, the NCAA raked in nearly one billion dollars off the backs of unpaid athlete labor, and Forbes sets the market value of elite college athletes in the multimillion dollar range.
Even more ridiculous is the aforementioned concept of athletic amateurism, which still remains intact under the NCAA’s newest set of proposed regulations. ESPN notes, “this unique status has helped the NCAA carve out a niche in the eyes of federal judges who have ruled that the NCAA’s caps on what an athlete can receive from his or her school violate antitrust laws but have determined the schools may continue enforcing those caps because college athletes are students and not laborers.”
This is a problem. Although the NCAA might appear to be working in favor of college athletes on the surface, NCAA president Mark Emmert and other power players are communicating with Congress to pass federal regulations which would render these proposals (and state legislation pertaining to NIL regulations) moot. Emmert’s federal proposals include:
· Ensuring federal preemption over state name, image and likeness laws.
· Establishing a “safe harbor” for the NCAA to provide protection against lawsuits filed for name, image and likeness rules.
· Safeguarding the non-employment status of student-athletes.
· Maintaining the distinction between college athletes and professional athletes.
In other words, college athletes should not be expecting to rake in multimillion-dollar contracts any time soon. Nor should they expect to be granted employee status or the right to unionize. Because, according to the NCAA, college athletes are not professionals or even laborers—they are students. And that only makes sense if you consider that the NCAA is good at profiting from college athletes, not stepping into their shoes.
Even when proposing legislation that looks emancipatory on the surface, the NCAA is still doing what it does best: regulating its athletes instead of taking care of them.
Follow Katie Lever on Twitter and Instagram for more NCAA policy insights: @leverfever
When doing research in the recruiting process for my daughter I came across the LRT Sports website. I was immediately intrigued as this was another dimension of the recruiting process that many people don't even consider. My daughter and I could "short list" schools based on the education she was looking for, as well as the opportunity to play her sport. LRT Sports not only gave us pertinent information into the recruiting process with different interviews of coaches and players, it also gave us insight into current and/or former players' opinions on the coach of that school in her sport. We could use this information to re-prioritize my daughters list of schools based on this feedback. I have many friends that are, or will be, going through this process shortly and I highly recommend using LRT Sports as part of anyone's recruiting process.
The college process presents a myriad of challenges. Factor in athletics and it becomes even more daunting. Now, add the fact that you have zero experience with sports. What is a the mother of a college bound student-athlete to do? LRT Sports has truly lived up to its promise. It has kept "the college recruiting process honest and easy by providing first hand information about coaches, schools and the recruiting process." Their interviews with current students, coaches, and professional athletes have provided realistic guidance. I am much more informed because of LRT Sports! The coach ratings are the most helpful. LRT Sports interviews allow us to hear from students as to how the adults are impacting not only their athletic experience but also how they are helping to shape their adult self.
The C.A.L.C. was thrilled to have Keirsten Sires come and speak to us on multiple topics relevant to high school athletics today, including recruiting. Keirsten reached all of our students and left them with great strategies that will not only help on the fields, courts, and mats, but also in the game of recruiting. She was a true professional and delivered a wonderful message.
Now that the recruiting process and the related stress is over, I wanted to thank you for your guidance. You did so much more than we had expected. Once you started the process by matching the best academic schools first, not the best sport programs, I knew you were the one. The way you laid out a timeline of contacting coaches, visits, and camps completely took any guesswork out of the plan for us. All of the student athletes that you put us in touch with gave us a look from the inside, and made us more comfortable knowing what was coming. Finally, using your website as a resource for knowing what to expect from different coaches based on former recruit reviews gave my son confidence before our meetings. There is no way we could have figured this out on our own, you really put us in a great position when decision time came.
I think hearing from other athletes is very beneficial. To be able to learn from people’s mistakes, and to be able to have access to those voices is really helpful; especially voices that have been there and done that. It’s very important for people to have access to information that could benefit them, and in this case there are many voices that can help the next wave of athletes.
If you have something that’s going to spell [the recruiting process] out for you… it’s so valuable. I think what everyone at LRT Sports is doing to spread the word and help advocate and educate athletes on the recruitment process is incredible.
Without question would have used LRT Sports. It would have probably been one of the most valuable tools that I could have had. If you want to know what these coaches are really like then I think this is the best tool out there. I’m really glad you are allowing recruits to have a resource like this moving forward.