This past month the NCAA approved rule changes on a number of issues for the 2018-19 college baseball season. The changes address issues such as player safety, the pace of play, clarification of ambiguous rules and the use of video replay. From an outsider’s perspective, the rule changes seem to be an attempt to bring college baseball in closer alignment with the way in which major league baseball is played. But some of the rules might be considered overreaching, removing elements of the game that is at the core of what baseball is about.
A primary goal of the NCAA is to maximize the safety of its student-athletes, especially when doing so does nothing to undermine the sport’s value. One of the new rules aims to do this by address catcher safety. The rule awards a strike anytime that the batter hits the catcher with their backswing.
Other new rules involving safety include awarding pitchers a strike if the batter intentionally leans to get hit by a pitch. In addition to prohibiting all uniformed team personnel from standing or sitting in the dugout extension area during play.
The use of video replay will see some changes in the coming year as well. In the 2018-19 season, coaches will be able to challenge two play a game from a list of 12 reviewable plays. Of the 12 reviewable plays, six can be challenged at any time by the crew chief, and the crew chief can challenge the other six only in the last two innings of regulation and extra innings.
Six plays that are currently reviewable:
Six additional plays that are being recommended to be reviewable:
Pace of Play
One major issue that the NCAA hopes to address with these rule changes is the pace of play, something that seems to impact all levels of baseball. The NCAA approved many changes in hopes of speeding up the average time it takes to complete games.
One of these rules is increased restrictions on the number of defensive meeting players and coaches can have. For the coming season defensive conferences now will be limited to six per regulation contest, of those six a maximum of three can include a coach. This is a change that attempts to mimic what Major League Baseball has done in recent years and will force managers to be more strategic with how they use their meetings.
A somewhat counter-intuitive rule change aimed at the pace of play was the decision to increase the time between innings to 120-seconds for all games, from 90 seconds (for untelevised games) and 108 seconds for televised games. This rule is intended to improve consistency between untelevised games and televised games. Additionally, it mandates that the clock start immediately after the last out is made and not when all the players get off the field, to improve both consistency and pace of play.
The NCAA next season will adopt the same no pitch intentional walk rule that Major League baseball adopted in 2017. That is if a coach wishes to walk a batter intentionally he can tell the ump and the player immediately takes first base instead of having the pitcher throw four balls. While this would speed up play, there are many examples of intentional walks that have gone wrong, with pitchers throwing errant balls or runners stealing bases (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJBMm70kRgo). So, while the speed of play might increase by a small amount, it comes at the cost of eliminating a tool that the offensive team could use.
A proposed rule change that was ultimately not approved was two 20-second play clocks. Members of the NCAA panel felt that the costs and installation of the clocks would be too much to bear for the limited improvement in the quality of play that they would provide. But they did not mention the potentially negative effects that a play clock might have on the game.
While the NCAA aims at reducing the time it takes to play games the effect of these changes must be evaluated. After all, baseball at its nature is a methodical game where small adjustments in strategy can have a significant impact on a game. If rules and timers continue to be added the nuances that are unique to baseball may unintentionally take a back seat in favor of the speed at which the games are played.
Head Baseball Coach at the University of Rochester Joe Reina sees some of these changes as a slippery slope saying, “I don’t know if time has a place in baseball.”. By trying to improve pace play the NCAA may be forgetting what baseball is all about.
Posted on October 22, 2018 in Rules and Regulations
When doing research in the recruiting process for my daughter I came across the LRT Sports website. I was immediately intrigued as this was another dimension of the recruiting process that many people don't even consider. My daughter and I could "short list" schools based on the education she was looking for, as well as the opportunity to play her sport. LRT Sports not only gave us pertinent information into the recruiting process with different interviews of coaches and players, it also gave us insight into current and/or former players' opinions on the coach of that school in her sport. We could use this information to re-prioritize my daughters list of schools based on this feedback. I have many friends that are, or will be, going through this process shortly and I highly recommend using LRT Sports as part of anyone's recruiting process.
The college process presents a myriad of challenges. Factor in athletics and it becomes even more daunting. Now, add the fact that you have zero experience with sports. What is a the mother of a college bound student-athlete to do? LRT Sports has truly lived up to its promise. It has kept "the college recruiting process honest and easy by providing first hand information about coaches, schools and the recruiting process." Their interviews with current students, coaches, and professional athletes have provided realistic guidance. I am much more informed because of LRT Sports! The coach ratings are the most helpful. LRT Sports interviews allow us to hear from students as to how the adults are impacting not only their athletic experience but also how they are helping to shape their adult self.
The C.A.L.C. was thrilled to have Keirsten Sires come and speak to us on multiple topics relevant to high school athletics today, including recruiting. Keirsten reached all of our students and left them with great strategies that will not only help on the fields, courts, and mats, but also in the game of recruiting. She was a true professional and delivered a wonderful message.
Now that the recruiting process and the related stress is over, I wanted to thank you for your guidance. You did so much more than we had expected. Once you started the process by matching the best academic schools first, not the best sport programs, I knew you were the one. The way you laid out a timeline of contacting coaches, visits, and camps completely took any guesswork out of the plan for us. All of the student athletes that you put us in touch with gave us a look from the inside, and made us more comfortable knowing what was coming. Finally, using your website as a resource for knowing what to expect from different coaches based on former recruit reviews gave my son confidence before our meetings. There is no way we could have figured this out on our own, you really put us in a great position when decision time came.
I think hearing from other athletes is very beneficial. To be able to learn from people’s mistakes, and to be able to have access to those voices is really helpful; especially voices that have been there and done that. It’s very important for people to have access to information that could benefit them, and in this case there are many voices that can help the next wave of athletes.
If you have something that’s going to spell [the recruiting process] out for you… it’s so valuable. I think what everyone at LRT Sports is doing to spread the word and help advocate and educate athletes on the recruitment process is incredible.
Without question would have used LRT Sports. It would have probably been one of the most valuable tools that I could have had. If you want to know what these coaches are really like then I think this is the best tool out there. I’m really glad you are allowing recruits to have a resource like this moving forward.